Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Politics

Pam Bondi Declines to Answer Trump-Related Questions in Closed-Door Epstein Investigation Hearing

Former US Attorney General Pam Bondi declined to answer questions related to President Donald Trump during a closed-door interview with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Friday, as lawmakers examined the Justice Department’s handling of records tied to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

According to Democratic committee Ranking Member Robert Garcia, Bondi refused to respond to any questions concerning whether Trump had directed her to redact or withhold information related to Epstein investigations. Garcia described parts of the interview as confrontational, saying Bondi repeatedly indicated she would not discuss matters involving the president.

During the session, Bondi reportedly redirected several inquiries to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, stating that he was overseeing the investigation and associated document release process. Garcia said Bondi also claimed she could not recall several details from events occurring roughly six months earlier.

Bondi told lawmakers that approximately three million pages of Epstein-related material remain unreleased. She said the documents were being withheld due to their connection with prosecutorial decisions made by the Department of Justice. She also acknowledged that she has not met with survivors of Epstein’s abuse, some of whom were present outside the hearing room during the proceedings.

One survivor, Danielle Bensky, criticised the handling of the interview, saying the process lacked transparency and accountability. She said victims deserved open proceedings rather than closed-door discussions.

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon and Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Guynn attended the interview alongside Bondi, representing the Justice Department. According to Garcia, Dhillon occasionally intervened during questioning and advised Bondi not to respond to certain topics.

The interview was neither conducted under oath nor recorded, a decision attributed to House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer. Comer had previously overseen Bondi’s removal from her position as Attorney General earlier in the year.

The format of the proceedings has drawn criticism from members of both parties. Republican Representative Nancy Mace of South Carolina, who had previously supported subpoenaing Bondi for sworn testimony, called the decision not to conduct a formal recorded deposition “highly disappointing.” However, most Republican members of the committee did not attend the interview, with Comer the only GOP member present.

Democratic lawmakers described the situation as an obstruction of transparency. Representative Maxwell Frost said the process amounted to a lack of accountability and accused officials of withholding information in plain sight.

Following the interview, committee officials confirmed that a transcript will be prepared and reviewed by the Department of Justice before public release through a standard “Notice of Errata” process. The timeline for publication has not been confirmed.

Lawmakers are now considering further subpoenas related to the Epstein investigations, including potential testimony from Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel. Some committee members are also seeking the release of additional documents they say remain undisclosed.

According to Garcia, a significant portion of Epstein-related records has not yet been made available to Congress or the public. He said further legal and procedural steps are being considered to compel disclosure and ensure compliance with transparency requirements.

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Fraudsters are increasingly using AI-generated images and videos to trick people into handing over sensitive personal and financial information, according to FraudSMART, the financial crime awareness initiative operated by the Banking and Payments Federation Ireland (BPFI). The organisation has reported a rise in online adverts promoting fake, State-backed investment schemes. These scams often use fabricated images of well-known politicians and business figures to make the offers appear legitimate and encourage users to click on registration links. Niamh Davenport, head of financial crime at BPFI, said scammers are deliberately exploiting recent media coverage of a planned State-backed savings and investment scheme to give their frauds a sense of credibility. “They often claim the scheme is open to everyone, but that places are limited and being ‘snapped up’ fast, in order to pressure people to act quickly,” she said. “They typically promise guaranteed returns or a guaranteed monthly income.” FraudSMART said that while anyone can be targeted, people in their early 50s are particularly vulnerable to investment scams. This age group is often focused on retirement planning, making them more receptive to financial offers that appear secure or high-yield. According to the organisation, most scams follow a similar pattern. Victims are first directed to click a registration link and complete a short online form providing their contact details. They are then contacted by someone posing as a financial adviser, who urges them to make an immediate “security deposit” to secure participation in the scheme. Once a payment is made, the money is quickly moved through multiple accounts, often overseas, making recovery extremely difficult. Davenport warned that scammers are becoming more sophisticated in their use of technology, particularly AI tools that allow them to create realistic but entirely fake promotional content. These materials are designed to mimic legitimate financial advertisements and build trust with potential victims. Recent figures from An Garda Síochána show investment fraud rose by 20% last year, with losses exceeding €20 million. The scale of individual scams varies widely, ranging from smaller crypto-related frauds involving a few hundred euro to large-scale investment schemes where victims lose tens of thousands. FraudSMART is urging the public to remain cautious when encountering online investment advertisements, especially those promising guaranteed returns or requiring urgent action. It also advises consumers to avoid sharing personal information with unverified sources and to be wary of pressure tactics designed to rush financial decisions. Authorities continue to warn that fraudsters are adapting quickly, using advanced digital tools to target victims across multiple platforms.

You May Also Like

Politics

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon announced on Sunday that the United States will send a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) battery to Israel, alongside...

Health

NEW YORK — Teen smoking in the United States has reached an all-time low in 2024, with significant declines in overall youth tobacco use,...

Politics

WASHINGTON — As the countdown to the November 5 presidential election continues, former President Donald Trump is urging his supporters to aim for a...

Politics

In September, NASA announced that summer 2024 was the hottest on record. Just days later, the U.S. faced the dual impact of Hurricanes Helene...