The Trump Administration has widened its campaign to reshape American higher education, extending a controversial federal funding proposal — the Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education — to all U.S. universities and colleges.
Originally offered to nine elite institutions, including MIT, Brown, and the University of Texas at Austin, the plan promises preferential federal funding in exchange for sweeping policy changes. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology was the first to reject the compact, describing it as incompatible with academic independence and scientific merit.
Following MIT’s decision, the White House extended the offer nationwide. “Higher Education has lost its way, and is now corrupting our youth and society with WOKE, SOCIALIST, and ANTI-AMERICAN ideology,” President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social. “My Administration is fixing this, and FAST, with our Great Reform Agenda in Higher Education.”
Under the 10-point proposal, universities would be required to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) offices, enforce standardized testing, and limit foreign student enrollment to 15 percent. The compact also calls for “single-sex spaces,” a biological definition of gender, and bans on considering race, ethnicity, or political views in admissions and hiring. Institutions agreeing to the terms would receive increased federal funding, while those refusing could face investigations or funding cuts.
White House spokesperson Liz Huston defended the plan, calling it a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to transform higher education.” Faculty and student groups across several universities, however, have denounced it as an assault on academic freedom.
Experts warn that widespread adoption of the compact could profoundly reshape higher education. “If successful, it would establish a level of federal control of the national mind that has never been seen before,” said Simon Marginson, professor of higher education at Oxford University. “It cuts across the long tradition of independent university teaching and research.”
Critics argue the compact politicizes academia and curtails free inquiry. The Center for American Progress described it as a tool to “chill expression disfavored by the government and lift up their preferred speech.” MIT’s faculty association added that universities “must not align with the ideological agendas of the administration of the day.”
Some analysts believe the policy could accelerate a “brain drain,” as prominent academics and researchers leave the United States. Nobel laureates Esther Duflo and Abhijit Banerjee recently announced their departure for Switzerland, following months of criticism of Trump’s education policies.
While university leaders weigh the financial benefits of compliance, many warn the compact could fracture the higher education system, dividing institutions between those that conform and those that resist. As Marginson noted, “The Administration’s plan has the potential to divide higher education communities down the middle — and, in doing so, reshape the very purpose of the American university.”